Just go ask your nearest neighborhood crow about that. Sometimes, those relate to intelligence, sometimes not - but when they relate to the latter, that how intelligence in animals develops and grows. Basically, those traits that confer reproductive advantages over time win out and get reproduced. Personally, I think that there is no limit to how intelligent dogs can become.Īs for how other animals do it, ask Darwin. Maybe we could do it by creating vast egg and sperm banks from all those canine gonads we’re removing or cutting off from the vas deferens, and then getting permits to breed very promising candidates.īut if we pay close attention to the behaviors that we get, then there’s no limit to the behaviors we can create, especially since we can shortcut the whole “natural selection process” while we’re at it.įind a dog that has an uncanny ability to mimic human speech? And another dog that is a one-trial learner? Smash that DNA together and repeat to see what happens. Were it gets tricky is that whole part where a lot of countries insist on all rescue animals being sterilized at adoption, which is great for reducing the excess population, but can also really ruin any possibility of selective breeding to create super-intelligent dogs. We’ve also definitely seen increased intelligence in dog breeds, particularly terriers, shepherds, and Labradors - the ones designed to hunt and help humans. I mean, come on - how else could we have turned the mighty wolf into the annoying as hell Maltese? We’ve been selectively breeding animals, especially dogs, for millennia, and we’ve had pretty good results in producing exactly the traits we’ve wanted. Would selectively breeding an animal such as a dog based on intelligence, increase its intelligence over time? If so, how intelligent could dogs become? If not, how does intelligence emerge in a species? Not to mention that you will be able to hear and smell every single thing that your body is doing.Īs for that last question on the implications of everyone perceiving reality differently? Well, I dealt with that one in depth not that long ago.
#1d4chan changing breeds tv
The brain also tries to make sense of every random input in these conditions, so that listening to white noise or static can turn into the most complicated music, just as looking at TV static or a random pattern in stucco or marble will also try to take on order. It was like talking to a Picasso painting, really. I liked to refer to this as “Hindu Time,” especially when talking to people, because the effect of trails would basically superimpose all of their micro-expressions and and facial movements over a few seconds in real time. The net result is that all sensory information comes flooding in uncensored and absolutely in real time, which often gives the perception of observing overlapping time - that is moments shortly in the past, right now, and shortly in the future all at once. And yes, I did the latter a good number of times when I was much younger. See, removing the time delay and the sensory filters is exactly what happens when someone takes any psychedelic drug, but particularly LSD. I hit a bunch of longer questions on this random harvest, but this one is actually very easy to answer, at least the “what would it be like” part. What would it be like if humans could perceive what the world is actually like and do it in real time? Also, what are the ramifications of every single person’s reality being a little different and unique to them? Plus, there is a slight delay, so you aren’t even experiencing the simulation in real time. Your perception of the world is just what your brain constructs for you from the signals sent by your senses.
#1d4chan changing breeds free
Feel free to give your own answers or ask your own questions in the comments.
#1d4chan changing breeds series
Here’s the next in an ongoing series in which I answer random questions generated by a website.
0 kommentar(er)
